xx |
Interview
with Marianela
Maldonado, Director
You
normally write and direct your films. What
attracted you to this project and how did
you find working with a screenwriter?
I
thought “Breaking Out” was a
very touching and different script. It deals
with the internal experience of depression
and it does so from the point of view of
the person who suffers from it. It was a
challenge, but the piece explores a theme
that interests me very much - the power
of the human mind. To be honest, it took
me a few days to fully understand the different
layers that this twelve-minute script explores.
I think it is complex and subtle at the
same time.
What
attracted me most was the fact that the
script had a powerful abstract metaphor
in a very realistic setting. In a few pages,
Pippa managed to tell so much about a real
character, Jessie and, at the same time,
comment on faith and depression.
This
is the first time I worked with a writer.
And I must say it was GREAT! First, the
theme was beautifully expressed and secondly,
the structure of the script was already
there when I started working with Pippa
on the script. I felt we were working very
much in the same direction and we both agreed
that our main priority was to convey Jessie’s
inner world.
How
is it different from writing and directing
your own material?
I
think it was a great experience. It gave
me enough perspective to look an the material
with a “fresh eye.” The theme
and the structure of the piece were clear
from the beginning, and it gave a lot of
freedom to concentrate in the visual approach.
I wanted to approach the story from a very
subjective point of view, so that the audience
could feel what Jessie is experiencing:
the sickness of melancholy. And working
closely with Pippa and Paola, we managed
to find small details, which helped us tell
the story in this way. I believe that content
and form must interact with each other and
mirror each other. And this script, in particular,
gave me the opportunity to explore the content
to find the appropriate form, which I hope,
translated into the visual style.
Interview
with Pippa Hinchley, Writer
Where did the idea of Breaking Out
come from?
The initial seed of the idea came from a
real life experience of a break-in and was,
to begin with a study of fear - a close
look at what it really feels like to know
that your life may be irreparably changed,
or over, in the next few minutes and the
powerlessness of those moments.
As a new writer I was learning a lot very
quickly at the time the short was first
being written and I soon discovered that
this was an 'anecdote' - a snapshot of real
life, rather than a 'story' with a change
and resolution for my protagonist. And,
that faithful as this description of fear
may be, it wasn't a drama unless something
was invested in the outcome, unless we cared
what happened.
So then the challenge was to come up with
a character who learns something or whose
life changes as a result of this fear, this
unwanted intrusion.
How
has the original idea evolved over time?
In developing the piece further it became
necessary, and a challenge, to engage and
empathise with Jessie - a character who
is lifeless and monosyllabic at the beginning.
This was achieved, hopefully, by creative
use of her surroundings and her upbeat answer
machine message, which tell us that she
is when not suffering from depression, a
vibrant person, with a keen sense of humour.
The character of her sister, Sara, also
sheds further light and shows the difficulties
of communicating with someone who has disengaged
from the world and even from those closest
to them.
How would you describe your collaboration
with Marianela, a writer/director herself?
In a word, wonderful!
Marianela has an awesome visual style which
lent itself particularly well to this script
especially as it's impact comes largely
from the minutiae of detail: the flicker
of an eye; the fractured images of the imagined
scenarios that Jessie sees in her mind's
eye.
She made many insightful additions to the
mis-en-scene, the whole look of the piece
and of course the careful, detailed nuances
necessary in the performances.
As a writer herself she was enormously in
tune with the script and with the process
of re-writing and adjusting it to get it
as perfect as possible before shooting began.
She painstakingly prepared every shot and
was mindful of every detail, down to the
colours present in Jessie's flat and clothing,
which would work best working on DV. Respect!
Interview with Natasha
Braier, Director of Photography
What
attracted you to work on a project like
‘Breaking Out’?
The most attractive thing about the project
was the fact that it wasn't so much about
telling a story, but about portraying an
emotional state of mind. It was a real challenge
to do it in a way that wasn't flirting with
the thriller aesthetics or even horror movie.
Even if Jessie's imaginations were quite
horrific, we had to find a language that
belonged to her subjectivity and be very
careful not to fall into the thriller/horror
stereotypes.
Can you describe
how you and Marianela first approached the
script to define
a visual language?
After I read the script for the first time
there was one image stuck in my head, Jessie's
eye behind the sheets, "seeing without
watching", just by the sound of the
off-screen activity of the intruder. In
my first conversation with Marianela it
was very clear that she was seeing the film
exactly in the same way. We tried to approach
the language of the film as a "lucid
dream", that blurry territory between
being asleep and awake, when you don't know
what is dream and what is reality, when
you are also not in control, you are stuck
in your bed without being able to move.
The repetitions, the circularity, the loops,
are also part of that world, and that's
why the editing was also a key element to
construct this language.
|
|